Contact

Wisconsin Defense.

We are ready to fight for you in your case in the following categories.
Click below to learn more about each:

Bail-Jumping

The non-compliance with conditions of release under Wis. Stat. §969. There are three levels of bail-jumping offenses.

Learn More
Burglary

Entry into a building illegally with intent to commit a crime, especially theft.

Learn More
Controlled Substance Crimes

When a defendant is found to be using, selling or in possession of illegal or prescription drugs.

Learn More
Operating
While Impaired

Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug.

Learn More
Disorderly
Conduct

When a person publicly engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous or unreasonably loud behavior.

Learn More
Bail-Jumping

The non-compliance with conditions of release under Wis. Stat. §969. There are three levels of bail-jumping offenses.

Learn More
Burglary

Entry into a building illegally with intent to commit a crime, especially theft.

Learn More
Controlled Substance Crimes

The most commonly-charged controlled substance crimes are manufacture, distribution and delivery, possession with the intent to distribute, and possession.

Learn More
Operating
While Impaired

Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug.

Learn More
Disorderly
Conduct

When a person publicly engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud or otherwise disorderly conduct.

Learn More
Daniel Repka of Repka Law

Wisconsin Victories

When we combine our passion for fighting for your constitutional rights with our dedication, determination, and expertise, we are proud to say that we have successfully led many of our clients to victory.

Read below to learn more about some of our proudest victories in the State of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Victories

CLASS F FELONY CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged R.J.S. with: 1) Possession of Methamphetamine with Intent to Distribute—a Class F felony, and 2) Possession of Drug Paraphernalia—an unclassified misdemeanor. We convinced the circuit court judge to suppress all of the evidence, as law enforcement collected it after conducting an unlawful traffic stop. Without any evidence, the prosecution had to dismiss the case.

CLASS A MISDEMEANOR CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged L.M.S. with Neglecting a Child—a Class A felony. We convinced the circuit court to suppress all of the evidence, as law enforcement collected it after conducting an unlawful search of L.M.S.’s residence. Without any evidence, the prosecution had to dismiss the case.

CLASS A MISDEMEANOR CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged M.D.A. with Failure to Report to County Jail—a Class A felony. After a thorough investigation, we discovered that M.D.A. asked for a delayed report date to jail. The prosecutor had to dismiss the case, as our evidence proved M.D.A. innocent.

CLASS A MISDEMEANOR CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged R.E.M. with Bail Jumping—a Class A misdemeanor—for failing to maintain absolute sobriety. At the preliminary hearing, we forced the officer admitted he did not ask R.E.M. to take a blood, breath, or urine test to show R.E.M. consumed alcohol. Accordingly, the judge directed the prosecutor to dismiss the case.

UNCLASSIFIED FORFEITURE CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged A.J.W. with Speeding (16-19 MPH Over in a 55 MPH Zone)—an unclassified forfeiture. We invoked A.J.W.’s right to a jury trial. After jury selection, we convinced the prosecutor that trying a speeding ticket was not in the public’s interest. Accordingly, the prosecution dismissed the case.

UNCLASSIFIED MISDEMEANOR CASE UNCHARGED

S.A.M. attended a rock concert in St. Croix County. Prior to entering, a security guard found prescription medication by going through S.A.M.’s backpack without consent and without a warrant. Those prescription medications did not have a label. The security guard forwarded the information to law enforcement, who charged S.A.M. with a misdemeanor. Before the first court appearance, we contacted the prosecutor and voiced our concerns about the illegal search of S.A.M.’s backpack. The prosecutor agreed and declined to prosecute S.A.M.

CLASS F FELONY CASE DISMISSED

The prosecution charged J.J.H. with Burglary—a Class F felony. We demanded a trial and notified the prosecution of our intent to offer an alibi defense. On the day of trial, the prosecution caved to our theory of defense and dismissed the case.

Request a Consultation
More Victories

Ensure Justice Is Served

We pride ourselves on our upstanding reputation in the legal community, our high level of communication with our clients, and our transparency throughout the entirety of the legal process.

Level the playing field and make sure your day in court is a fair one.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.